翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Ruwi ・ Ruwido ・ Ruwiel ・ Ruwin Peiris ・ Rux ・ Rux Revue ・ Ruxandra ・ Ruxandra Cesereanu ・ Ruxandra Donose ・ Ruxandra Dragomir ・ Ruxandra Dumitrescu ・ Ruxandra Nedelcu ・ Ruxandra Popa ・ Ruxford ・ Ruxley ・ Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth ・ Ruxley Gravel Pits ・ Ruxolitinib ・ Ruxox Cell ・ Ruxton ・ Ruxton (automobile) ・ Ruxton Creek ・ Ruxton Hayward ・ Ruxton Island ・ Ruxton Park ・ Ruxton-Riderwood, Maryland ・ Ruy ・ Ruy Barbosa Popolizio ・ Ruy Barbosa, Bahia ・ Ruy Barbosa, Rio Grande do Norte Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth ： ウィキペディア英語版 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth ''Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth'' () (UKHL 8 ) is an English contract law case, concerning the choice between an award of damages for the cost of curing a defect in a building contract or (when that is unreasonable) for awarding damages for loss of "amenity". ==Facts== Ruxley Electronics Ltd was meant to build a seven-foot six inch deep pool, but it was built to only six feet. It was found that the pool was safe for diving, and anyway Forsyth never intended to put in a diving board. Also, Forsyth had no intention to use the damages to correct the pool. Moreover £21,560 was unreasonable for a new pool. But Forsyth refused to pay any money given the defect. Ruxley Electronics Ltd sued for breach of contract. Forsyth counterclaimed requesting damages to fix the pool as it should have been. The trial judge gave the diminution of value was zero and the cost of cure was £21,560. He awarded £750 for inconvenience and £2500 for loss of amenity. The Court of Appeal said the cost of rebuilding the pool should be awarded. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.